Fantasy Baseball Generals

Fantasy Baseball Warfare is a great matter to a nation; it is the ground of death and of life; it is the way of survival and of destruction, and must be examined.–Sun Tzu

Not a Sleeper: Adam Wainwright

February 13th, 2008 · 4 Comments

Mike Podhorzer


An analysis of popular sleeper Adam Wainwright.

My 2nd choice in my Not a Sleeper series might surprise some people. Unlike Micah Owings, who I profiled first, I have seen Wainwright’s name on many a sleeper list. It’s easy to see why- to start, he was a former top prospect with the Braves and was the centerpiece of the Cardinals end of the trade involving J.D. Drew. He then dominated as a reliever in his first full year in the Bigs in ‘06, even taking on the closer role at the end of the season for a team who (somehow) won the World Series. After his move back to the rotation in ‘07, Wainwright posted a sparkling 2.97 ERA in the 2nd half, causing owners to fall over themselves to move him up their ‘08 draft boards and name him the sleeper du jour. But if we look a little closer, we notice that this pitcher’s sleeper tag should be removed.

2007 Analysis: Wainwright’s excellent 2nd half ERA of 2.97 was boosted by a high 77% strand rate and an unsustainably low 4% HR/F. His 2nd half xERA of 3.97 was exactly 1.00 higher than his actual ERA and is more reflective of his true skill level. I want to point out that his skills did improve significantly in the 2nd half, as his K/9 increased from 5.2 to 6.7 and BB/9 dropped from 3.3 to 3.0. His full-season stats show he suffered from a slightly elevated BABIP, but that was more than made up for by his low 6% HR/F. The low HR/F explains why his WHIP of 1.40 is so out of whack with his 3.70 ERA. Runners were getting on base, but the depressed HR/F rate didn’t allow as many to score as expected.

2008 Outlook: Looking at Wainwright’s Minor League career and coupled with his 2nd half improvements in K/9 and BB/9, he seems capable of posting those numbers over a full season. If we assume a 2.9 BB/9 and 6.7 K/9, coupled with a solid 48% GB rate, we’re looking at an ERA around 3.90-4.00 with a 1.30ish WHIP. Ignoring wins, these stats should generate a fantasy value similar to last year’s. Even with an increase in skills, he’ll be hard pressed to better last year’s 3.70 ERA, and those owners expecting a big breakout to the tune of a low-to-mid 3’s ERA are likely to be disappointed.

Questions, comments, criticisms, praise, expert league invitations? Email me at FBGeneralsMike@gmail.com.

Tags: Uncategorized

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1 willclarkismyhero // Feb 14, 2008 at 4:39 pm

    Nicely done. Are there any more of these types we should know about? Keep them coming.

  • 2 Mike Podhorzer // Feb 14, 2008 at 8:03 pm

    hey will, good to see you back…you bet!! i have a list of about 4 more, i’ll try cranking them all out by the end of the 3-day weekend

  • 3 Patrick DiCaprio // Feb 14, 2008 at 8:09 pm

    This shows that even guys who write for the same website can disagree! I like Wainwright this year. He was a much better pitcher in the second half, increasing his K rate, decreasing his BB rate and having a fully supportable 30% hit rate and an xERA of 3.82.

  • 4 Mike Podhorzer // Feb 14, 2008 at 9:47 pm

    Hahaha, i know i know Patrick, i did say that about his 2nd half!! Maybe i should have indicated that i don’t “dislike” him this year. I would certainly draft him. I just don’t think the sleeper tag fits.

    Actually, after look at the new Cardinals stadium park factor for HRs, it’s possible Wainwright could maintain an 8% HR/F rate, which would make a 3.70-3.80 ERA attainable without any other good/bad luck involved.

    I just don’t think a low to mid 3’s ERA is possible, which is what i’m seeing projected by a lot of message board posters.

Leave a Comment