
A look at over/undervalued players at each position.
After a short break from analyzing MDC’s Top 250 ADP report, I’m back in action. Fortunately for us, Sport Fanatics has updated their list as of March 10th, which is what I’ll be looking at today. Starting pitcher is easily the position with the most disagreement, and I expect my list of over/undervalued players will include some you have a differing opinion on. But as we all know, I’m right, and you’re wrong, so pay close attention. I’m kidding of course, but I’ll be focusing on the underlying skills that 90% of fantasy owners don’t, instead seeing a name and a 2007 ERA and drafting based on those. This first part will take a look at the overvalued group.
Overvalued
John Lackey (52nd overall, 7th amongst SP)- 3 straight years of xERAs in the high 3’s and a K rate that has fallen each of the last 3 years. Last year’s 3.01 ERA (benefiting from a high 77% strand rate) and 19 wins is boosting his ADP, but his xERA was actually 3.75. His 7.2 K/9 is above average, but nowhere near elite and not high enough to warrant a top 10 SP ranking. The Spring Training elbow problems certainly don’t help either. I had him ranked 18th among SPs for my last draft.
Justin Verlander (65, 10)- The final straw of his overrating came when I saw a poster on a message board I frequent rank him as the 4th best SP. The hype has officially gotten out of control! His walk rate is only average and he’s a neutral GB/FB pitcher. His only above average attribute is his K/9, which was 8.2 last year. I get it, people are obsessed with his stuff and 257 MPH fastball. But we all know that whatever stuff he has will show up in the stats! Assuming a similar GB/FB ratio, he’d have to lower his BB/9 to around 2.5 and increase his K/9 for the 2nd straight season to 8.5 just to be worth the 10th best SP. That’s asking a lot and certainly no one should be paying for that. Oh yeah, I had him ranked 21st among SPs for my last draft.
Carlos Zambrano (69, 11)- This one is too easy. A terrible BB/9, a declining K/9 that has dropped to merely above average, ERAs benefiting from BABIPs between .260 and .280 that could regress any year, and a zillion innings for a pitcher who’s only 26. Even his once stellar GB% has declined for 4 straight years! His name must be the only thing right now causing people to draft him so early, because the skill set certainly doesn’t explain it. Umm, I had him ranked 34th among SPs for my last draft. Yup, 34th.
Chris Young (85, 17)- .252 BABIP last year and .237 the year before. Does he possess the rare ability to control his hits allowed? Well in 2005 (while in Texas), his BABIP was a near league average .304, so I’m not so sure. I doubt PETCO could have THAT much of an effect. His HR/F was also a ridiculously low 4% last year. Think it’s PETCO again? Well in 2006 in PETCO, his HR/F was 10%, so seems like last year was simply the result of great luck. He has a poor BB/9, increasing the last 2 years (but an improving K/9, which has probably peaked) and gives up a ton of flyballs. His xERAs have been over 4 the last 3 years. He also hasn’t pitched more than 179 innings in his major league career. Add this all up, and you got a pitcher I have ranked 26th.
Fausto Carmona (106, 21)- No surprise here after the season he had. He has a solid skill set, inducing a ton of ground balls and possessing decent control. But the K/9 is simply too low and limits his upside. Last year’s 3.06 ERA benefited from a .281 BABIP and a high 77% strand rate. He also pitched over 100 innings more than ‘06, increasing burnout risk. I had him ranked 31st.
Brad Penny (129, 29)- I thought everyone knew last year’s ERA was a mirage. I guess not. His xERA was over 4 last year and has been around 4 the last 5 years. In fact, last year he posted one of the worst skill sets of his career. A K/BB ratio under 2, a BB/9 that crept over 3 for the first time since 2002, and a K/9 that fell below 6 for the first time in his career. The only saving grace was an increased GB% to a very solid 49%. So how did he manage a 3.03 ERA? A 4% HR/F and 77% strand rate will do that for you. I had him ranked a crazy (for some readers) 56th.
Ted Lilly (130, 30)- The big difference was a career best 2.4 BB/9 and a .272 BABIP. That hit rate won’t last, and given Lilly’s history of walk rates over 4 the previous 3 years, I wouldn’t bet on a repeat of that either. With all the flyballs, there is little chance he could keep his ERA below 4 in ‘08. I had him ranked 47th.
John Maine (134, 32)- Another flyball pitcher with below average control and a huge spike in K/9. His ERA is going to rise back over 4 to go along with a likely WHIP of 1.30+. If he improved his walk rate to 3.0 or better, and induced some more grounders, he could post another sub-4 ERA, but given his history, it’s just something you can expect. I had him ranked 51st.
And there you have it, let the arguing commence! Next up will be the undervalued pitchers, which should prove to be a calmer, gentler environment.
Questions, comments, criticisms, praise, expert league invitations? Email me at FBGeneralsMike@gmail.com.


3 responses so far ↓
1 Phil // Mar 15, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Great blog by the way…Lackey and Zambrano are right on, way overrated, so are most of the others, outside of Chris Young. Don’t see the reasoning there, and he’s definitely not 26th. I have him at a reasonable 13. Greener on the Other Side just did a good piece on him, and he’s well worth drafting.
2 Brandon Heikoop // Mar 17, 2008 at 12:48 am
I dislike that everyone is on the ‘bash Fausto bandwagon’ citing his K/9 as the prime reason. The reason for this is two fold. First, at times one needs to look at the ’stuff’, which Fausto possesses as much as any young pitcher when you consider control. I know the ’stuff’ hasn’t always translated into outstanding strikeout numbers, but lets keep in mind his age and that there is a strong chance he is still learning how to pitch. The second reason, and this is something numbers people always miss (not you specifically), are the splits. I hear experts talk about how Kouzmanoff hit amazing from May 1 on, but when the information strays from their argument, they ignore it. Case and point, Fausto Carmona.
First half K/9 - 5.10.
Second half K/9 - 6.37.
By comparison, the top 5 GB pitchers outside of Carmona have the following K/9 career figures: 5.87, 6.18, 7.27, 8.08 and 3.83.
So if Fausto can improve on his second half K/9 (not impossible), or even duplicate it, he will be more then fine.
3 Mike Podhorzer // Mar 17, 2008 at 3:39 pm
Hey Brandon, I should probably provide my exact projection for Carmona so it’s easier to discuss our opinions. I have him at a 3.64 ERA, 1.30 WHIP, 15 Wins, and 138 Ks (6.2 K/9) in 200 IP.
So I certainly took his history and 2nd half into account when projecting his K’s. However, K’s IS still a category, and his total is quite average, so it does hurt his value. And given the lack of K’s, he’ll give up more hits, hurting his WHIP. Overall, those projections ranked him 31st.
Do you have any disagreements about the projection? Because i’m fairly confident in the values the projections produce.
Leave a Comment